Policies and Standards
The Institutional Framework Governing Our Scientific and Professional Commitment
At the Scientific Advisory Board (SAC), policies and standards are not merely internal regulatory tools; rather, they are the fundamental cornerstone upon which our institutional identity is built and the foundation for all our scientific initiatives, academic partnerships, and research projects. These policies represent a profound commitment to good governance, scientific integrity, and social responsibility. They constitute the framework guiding our interactions with scientific institutions, government bodies, research centers, and researchers across various disciplines. Designed to align with adopted global best practices found in leading scientific institutions, our policies are guided by frameworks of scientific research ethics, data quality systems, and global methodologies in knowledge and innovation management. We do not merely manage a scientific ecosystem; we are building an ecosystem of trust—the trust of researchers that their research environment is safe and transparent, the trust of our partners that collaboration with us is founded on credibility, and the trust of society that knowledge is harnessed to serve humanity and development.
Data Protection and Scientific Information Security
In light of the growing role of Big Data and the increasing volume of scientific studies relying on digital databases, the Scientific Advisory Board (SAC) is committed to implementing a rigorous information protection system. This system is based on models and frameworks similar to those employed by global research institutions and data laboratories. We adhere to international privacy protection standards and provide a secure digital infrastructure supported by robust encryption protocols, intrusion detection systems, and data centers subject to continuous auditing and review. For us, information protection is not merely a technical process; rather, it is an ethical commitment to our researchers, members, and partner institutions. It serves as the foundation for maintaining trust between the scientific community and the Board. Furthermore, data protection principles have been integrated into the “Scientific Research Ethics Charter” to become a mandatory component of research work.
Responsible and Transparent Scientific Partnerships
Scientific partnerships established by the Scientific Advisory Board undergo the highest levels of evaluation and review to ensure their alignment with standards of responsible practice. No scientific or research agreement is concluded prior to conducting a comprehensive review that encompasses ethical, legal, technical, and methodological aspects.All partnerships established by the Board are committed to respecting data protection policies, research integrity, and the equitable exchange of knowledge. To enhance transparency, the Board publishes periodic reports highlighting major projects and partnerships, enabling the scientific and academic community to monitor the Board’s activities and verify their consistency with its mission and objectives.The Board is building a broad network of cooperation involving governments, research institutions, global universities, and scientific centers, ensuring that every technical collaboration is simultaneously a knowledge-based and humanitarian collaboration.
Data Governance and Statistical Quality
Data governance is a fundamental part of the Scientific Advisory Board’s operations. Our role is not limited to merely collecting scientific data, but extends to ensuring its integrity, accuracy, and suitability for ongoing research. The Board adopts frameworks inspired by international statistical centers with extensive experience in quality and efficiency. It applies rigorous standards covering data collection, classification, analysis, and documentation to ensure transparency and sound methodology. Furthermore, the Board adheres to standards for data exchange among research teams to ensure procedural integrity and provide an integrated environment that complies with local and international laws regarding the protection of scientific information. The Board always emphasizes that technical collaboration in the field of data must be accompanied by humanitarian and ethical responsibility.
Scientific Research Ethics: Principles First
We believe that any scientific practice lacking a solid ethical framework entails risks that extend beyond the boundaries of the laboratory or academic publishing. Therefore, the Scientific Advisory Board (SAC) adopts an integrated system of ethical principles that constitutes an intrinsic part of its operations. These principles include scientific fairness, avoidance of bias, transparency, protection of study participants’ rights, and the maintenance of methodological integrity in data collection, analysis, and dissemination. No project or initiative under the Board’s umbrella may be approved without undergoing a systematic ethical review. This ensures alignment with these principles and confirms the adherence of those involved to all established scientific and professional foundations. Furthermore, the Board has developed the “Scientific Research Ethics Charter” to serve as a binding document for all researchers, consultants, and members.
Multi-Level Legal and Academic Commitment
The Board’s regulatory policies are grounded in a comprehensive set of legal frameworks and internationally recognized scientific benchmarks. These include data protection legislation, scientific research governance frameworks, and international guidelines on safety and ethics, in addition to standards adopted by global institutions for institutional excellence. This institutional framework undergoes periodic reviews to ensure its alignment with scientific and technical advancements, thereby enhancing its capacity to address emerging challenges imposed by modern research. In this context, the “Scientific Research Ethics Charter” serves as a pivotal document. It defines the responsibilities of researchers and members toward both the institution and society, ensuring that scientific endeavors do not conflict with established legislation or human values.
Conclusion
The policies and standards upheld by the Scientific Advisory Board are not merely regulatory documents; rather, they are the embodiment of our vision for a scientific world that is more equitable, transparent, and deeply committed to humanity and knowledge. Every project, study, and partnership operates within this framework, as it serves as the true guarantor for maintaining trust and cementing the Board’s standing as a trusted scientific institution on both national and international levels. These policies constitute the essence of the Board’s institutional identity, endowing its operations and initiatives with credibility and sustainability.
